CIM analysis

AI CIM Analysis for M&A

A Confidential Information Memorandum is written to sell. TrueValue reads it the way a sceptical analyst would: it extracts the financials, scores the business against your acquisition mandate, runs an indicative valuation, names the red flags and lists what the document does not say, in minutes rather than an afternoon. You read a first pass with the evidence attached and decide whether to spend real time.

Analyse a CIM in your free trial Watch the Agent analyse a deal
  • £399/month
  • Unlimited users and deals
  • TrueValue Agent included
  • No credit card required

What is a CIM?

A Confidential Information Memorandum (CIM) is the document a seller or their adviser prepares to present a business to prospective buyers after a non-disclosure agreement is signed. It describes the company, its market, its management and its financial history, and it is the basis on which a buyer decides whether to submit an indication of interest. In the UK mid-market it is often called an Information Memorandum (IM); a shorter anonymised summary circulated before the NDA is the teaser.

A CIM is an advocacy document. It is accurate in the sense that a good adviser will not put a false number in it, and selective in the sense that every choice about what to include, which years to show, which adjustments to make to earnings and which risks to mention was made by the side that wants the highest price. Reading one well means holding both facts at once.

What is CIM analysis?

CIM analysis is the first-pass review a buyer performs on a memorandum to decide whether an opportunity deserves further work: extracting the financial information, testing the narrative against the numbers, measuring the business against the buyer's own criteria, forming an early view of value and identifying the questions that diligence would have to answer.

It is not diligence. Diligence verifies; a first pass triages. The purpose is to get from "a CIM arrived" to one of three honest positions — pursue, pass, or pursue subject to specific questions — quickly enough that the good opportunities get the time and the poor ones do not.

What experienced buyers look for in a CIM

The document is read in a fixed order because the questions build on each other. The full list is in the CIM analysis checklist.

The business and why it is for sale

  • What the company actually does, for whom, and how it gets paid
  • The stated reason for sale, and whether the rest of the document supports it
  • Ownership, management depth and how much of the business sits in the owner's head
  • Where the company sits in its market, and what evidence is offered for the position claimed

The financial history

  • Revenue, gross profit and EBITDA for each year shown, and which years are audited, management-prepared or forecast
  • Every adjustment made to reported earnings, with its justification
  • Recurring versus one-off revenue, and how "recurring" is defined
  • Working capital, capital expenditure and what cash the business actually produces

Concentration and dependence

  • Share of revenue from the largest customer and the top five, with contract terms
  • Supplier and key-person dependence
  • Contracts that change on a change of control

What is missing

  • Years, segments or metrics conspicuously absent
  • Claims stated without evidence
  • The gap between the story told and the numbers shown

How long a first pass takes, and why

A thorough manual first pass on a mid-market CIM — reading the document, spreading three to five years of financials into a screening model, checking the adjustments, and writing up a view — is typically measured in hours rather than minutes. The exact figure depends on the length of the memorandum, the quality of its financial appendix and how much of it has to be retyped. The time is not spent thinking; most of it is spent finding, transcribing and reconciling.

That cost shapes behaviour. A team that receives more memoranda than it can read properly either reads them badly or reads a subset, and the subset is chosen by whoever sent it rather than by what is in it. The point of automating the first pass is not to remove judgement from screening; it is to spend the judgement on every opportunity rather than on the ones that happened to arrive on a quiet week.

The financial information that matters

These are the figures TrueValue extracts from a memorandum, and what each one is for.

  • Revenue and gross profit by year

    The trajectory and the margin. Growth claims are tested against these before anything else.

  • EBITDA, add-backs and SDE

    Reported earnings, every adjustment the seller has made, and the owner-benefit figure a smaller business is often priced on. See EBITDA vs SDE.

  • Recurring revenue share

    How much of next year is already contracted, and on what definition of "recurring".

  • Customer concentration

    The share of revenue from the largest customer. Above a threshold it changes price, structure and the diligence plan. See customer concentration risk.

  • Owner involvement and growth rate

    How dependent the earnings are on the person leaving, and whether the growth story is historical or projected.

  • Asking price and reason for sale

    Where the seller has anchored, and the stated motive the rest of the document has to be consistent with.

Common CIM red flags

None of these is disqualifying on its own. Each is a question the first pass should carry into the next conversation.

  • Adjusted EBITDA that outruns reported EBITDA

    A long list of add-backs — owner salary normalisation, "one-off" costs that recur each year, capitalised development — can turn a modest business into an attractive one on paper. Every adjustment needs a reason and a receipt.

  • A hockey-stick forecast after flat history

    Three flat years and a projected doubling is a claim about the future, not a fact about the business. It should be labelled a projection and priced as one.

  • Concentration mentioned only in passing

    If the top customer is not quantified, assume the number is uncomfortable. Contract terms and renewal dates matter as much as the percentage.

  • Missing years or a changed year-end

    A gap in the history, or a period shown for eleven months, usually has a story behind it.

  • Owner-dependent revenue

    Relationships held personally by the seller, technical knowledge that has not been documented, or a sales pipeline that is one person's phone.

  • Working capital left out of the picture

    Growing businesses absorb cash. A memorandum that shows EBITDA and never shows debtor, creditor and stock days is showing you the profit and not the cash.

How AI can assist CIM analysis, and where it should stop

The transcription and reconciliation that make a first pass slow are exactly what a language model is good at: reading a long document, finding the financial tables, extracting each figure into a structured record and noting what is claimed without evidence. Done well, that removes most of the hours from the first pass and none of the judgement.

Done badly, it introduces a new failure: a confident summary with an invented number in it. The test for any AI CIM tool is therefore not how fluent its summary is but whether every figure it reports can be traced to the page it was read from, whether it says "not stated" when the document does not state something, and whether the valuation it produces is computed by an engine you can inspect rather than generated by the model. Our guide on what to look for in AI CIM analysis goes through the tests in detail.

The decisions that remain a person's are the ones the document cannot settle: whether the reason for sale is credible, whether the management team can run the business without the founder, whether the price the numbers support is a price worth paying, and whether to spend the firm's time on this opportunity rather than the next one.

How TrueValue analyses a CIM

Upload a PDF, Excel, CSV or Word memorandum to the CIM Analyzer, or let the Agent pick it up when it lands on a deal.

  1. CIM uploaded
  2. Financials extracted
  3. Mandate fit assessed
  4. Valuation generated
  5. Risks surfaced
  6. Recommendation prepared

Every stage writes to the deal record. The recommendation is a proposal a person accepts, edits or dismisses.

Inside the analysis

  • Financial extraction

    The memorandum is read for company name, sector, location, employees, business model, asking price, reason for sale, and each financial year's revenue, gross profit, EBITDA, add-backs and SDE, plus recurring revenue share, customer concentration, owner involvement and growth rate. A figure the document does not state is recorded as not stated, never estimated.

  • Mandate fit scoring

    Your acquisition mandate is held as numbers — sector, size, geography, earnings, return hurdles — and every CIM is scored against it. An unknown is never scored as a miss: a memorandum that omits EBITDA is flagged for the gap, not penalised as if the figure were bad.

    AI Agent for M&A teams

  • A deterministic scorecard

    The screening score is computed by a versioned rule set from the extracted figures, so two analysts uploading the same document get the same score, and a change to the rules is a change you can read.

  • Valuation hand-off

    The extracted figures are handed to the valuation wizard with only stated values travelling and the missing ones named, so the indicative valuation runs on the memorandum's own numbers through the same five-method engine used for a full valuation.

    M&A valuation software

  • Red flags and missing information

    Strengths, red flags and the information the document leaves out are listed as findings, each pointing back to what was read. Findings become diligence questions when the CIM is promoted to a deal.

    M&A due diligence software

  • Promote to a deal

    One click creates the deal with the company, the figures, the analysis and the mandate score already on it. From there the Agent can run the full valuation, the returns model and the diligence request list.

    M&A deal management software

Findings linked to evidence, and confidential information handled as such

A finding without a source is an opinion. Every figure the CIM Analyzer reports is stored with the document it came from, and every figure the Agent later writes into a memo or a proposal is checked against the figures actually read — a number with no source in the record is refused rather than repaired. When the analysis feeds a valuation, the valuation records which document each input came from and what that document is worth: filed accounts, management-stated figures and a seller's projection are labelled as such and never presented as the same thing.

Memoranda are confidential documents and are stored in your workspace's own private storage, encrypted at rest and in transit. Access is isolated per workspace in the database itself, roles control who in your team can see a deal, and an audit log written by the database records who did what. The security page describes the controls in place, and our data processing agreement covers the processing terms for AI extraction.

The decisions that stay with you

TrueValue produces a first pass, not a verdict. Whether to pursue, what to offer, how to structure it and whether to walk away are decisions a person makes with the analysis in front of them. The Agent files a recommendation with the evidence attached; it does not submit an indication of interest, send a request list or contact a seller without a click from you. That boundary is enforced in the runtime, not stated in a policy document.

Frequently asked questions

What file types can I upload?

PDF, Excel, CSV and Word. Scanned PDFs are read as text where the scan quality allows; a page that cannot be read is reported as unread rather than guessed.

How long does the analysis take?

Extraction, scoring and the indicative valuation typically complete in a few minutes for a normal-length memorandum. You are notified when it is ready and can read the findings as they are written.

How is mandate fit scored?

Against the acquisition mandate you set as numbers in TrueValue. Each criterion the memorandum states is scored; each it omits is listed as unknown and left out of the score, so a thin document is flagged for its gaps rather than penalised for them. See how to build an acquisition mandate.

Can the AI invent a figure?

No. Extraction records only what the document states, and every figure the Agent later writes is checked against the figures it read. A figure with no source is refused. The valuation is computed by a deterministic engine the AI cannot alter.

What happens after the first pass?

Promote the CIM to a deal and the figures, findings and mandate score travel with it. From the deal you can run the full valuation, model the returns at your hurdle rate, and send the seller a diligence request list built from the questions the analysis raised.

Is a CIM the same as an IM?

In practice yes. "Confidential Information Memorandum" is the usual North American term and "Information Memorandum" the usual UK one. The teaser is the shorter, anonymised summary sent before the NDA. See what is an investment memorandum.

Is TrueValue only for buyers?

The CIM Analyzer is a buy-side tool. Advisers use the same workspace in adviser mode to produce the memorandum in the first place — see M&A document management.

Guides and tools for CIM review

See TrueValue analyse a deal

Open the demo workspace to watch the Agent work a sample CIM end to end, or start a trial and upload one of your own. No card, no call.

Analyse a CIM in your free trial Watch the Agent analyse a deal